‘My Terrorism is Good’

Abstract

This article analyzes the concept of terrorism and its various manifestations, arguing that no form of terror can be justified regardless of the perpetrator—whether it be a government, a group, or an individual. The paper explores how double standards in defining terrorism often overlook state-sponsored violence while condemning acts by smaller groups or individuals. The author contends that historical examples such as the Chilean coup and Stalinist purges demonstrate governmental terror, which is frequently ignored in Western discourse. This work investigates the socio-economic factors contributing to terrorism, particularly the widening income gap between northern and southern countries due to globalization. The article demonstrates how the attacks on the World Trade Center and subsequent U.S. actions in Afghanistan highlight the tension between combating terrorism and upholding democracy and human rights. The significance of this study lies in its call for a consistent moral stance against all forms of terrorism, emphasizing that understanding the roots of terror does not justify violent acts.

(The abstract and keywords were prepared retrospectively for indexing purposes using AI-assisted tools and editorial review, based on the original article. They did not appear in the original publication.