The “Unmanning” Word: Language, Masculinity and Political Correctness in the Work of David Mamet and Philip Roth

Authors

  • Paul McDonald Author

Keywords:

Philip Roth, David Mamet, masculinity, language, political correctness

Abstract

This article examines the relationship between language, masculinity, and social inadequacy in works by Philip Roth and David Mamet. It argues that male protagonists use aggressive and misogynistic language as a means of asserting identity, yet ultimately reveal their inability to form mature relationships. The study also explores how political correctness intensifies this crisis of masculinity, transforming linguistic expression into a site of constraint.

 

(The abstract and keywords were prepared retrospectively for indexing purposes using AI-assisted tools and editorial review, based on the original article. They did not appear in the original publication.)

References

Allen, Mary. “When She Was Good She Was Horrid.” The Necessary Blankness:

Women in Major Fiction of the Sixties. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1976.

Bechtel, Roger. “P.C. Power Play: Language and Representation in David

Mamet’s Oleanna.” Theatre Studies (Columbus, Ohio), 41 (1996): 29-48.

Berridge, Elizabeth. “Recent Fiction.” Daily Telegraph, 17 April 1969.

Buchan, Irving. “Portnoy’s Complaint, or the Rooster’s Kvetch.” Studies in the

Twentieth Century 6 (1970): 97-107.

“David Mamet on Trial at the Court of Feminism.” Independent 3 July 1993.

Dean, Anne. David Mamet: Language as Dramatic Action. London: Associated

University Presses, 1990.

Forrey, Robert. “Oedipal Politics in Portnoy’s Complaint.” Critical Essays on

Philip Roth. Ed. Sanford Pinsker. Boston: G.K. Hall, 1982.

Jones, Judith Paterson and Guinevera Nance. Philip Roth. New York: Ungar, 1981.

Jones, Nesta and Steven Dykes, eds. File On Mamet. London: Methuen, 1991.

Macleod, Christine. “The Politics of Gender, Language and Hierarchy in

Mamet’s Oleanna.” Journal of American Studies 29 (1995): 199-214.

Mamet, David. Sexual Perversity in Chicago and The Duck Variations: Two Plays.

1974. New York: French, 1977.

Mamet, David. Oleanna. 1992. New York: Random House Vintage Books, 1993.

Mannes, Marya. “A Dissent from Marya Mannes.” Saturday Review 22 February

1969: 39.

Michel, Pierre. “Portnoy’s Complaint and Philip Roth’s Complexities.” Dutch

Quarterly Review of Anglo American Letters 4 (1974): 1-10.

Norris, Hoke. “Is Philip Roth Anti-Semitic?” Chicago Times Bookweek 26 May

1968: 2.

Piette, Alain. “The Devil’s Advocate: David Mamet’s Oleanna and Political

Correctness.” Staging Difference: Cultural Pluralism in American Theatre and

Drama. Ed. Marc Maufort. New York: Peter Lang, 1995.

Roth, Philip. Portnoy’s Complaint. 1969. London: Jonathan Cape, 1971.

Roth, Philip. Deception. London: Jonathan Cape, 1991.

Skeele, David. “The Devil and David Mamet.” Modern Drama (Canada) 36

(1993): 512-518.

Stout, Janis. “The Misogyny of Roth’s The Great American Novel.” Ball State

University Forum 27. 1 (1986): 72-75.

Downloads

Published

1998-04-01

Issue

Section

Research Articles

Categories

How to Cite

The “Unmanning” Word: Language, Masculinity and Political Correctness in the Work of David Mamet and Philip Roth. (1998). Journal of American Studies of Turkey, 7, 23-30. https://www.jast.org.tr/index.php/main/article/view/468